Fadden vs Hume, ACT Suburb Comparison

Fadden for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FaddenHume

Overall score

Fadden

61.6/100

Hume

16.1/100

Crime rate

Fadden

8.0 / 1k

Hume

260.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fadden

224

Hume

43

Population

Fadden

3,006

Hume

395

Metric leadFadden 9Hume 0across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFaddenHume
Overall score61.6/10016.1/100
Housing (desirability)56.8/1000.6/100
Crime rate8.0 / 1k260.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools5—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves3—
Walkability30.0/1006.5/100
Nearby amenities22443
Planning activity37
Green cover35.8%0.3%
Population3,006395
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/10—

Comparison summary

Fadden reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Hume is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm.

Fadden pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability, whereas Hume is the better pick for recognised heritage character and improving crime trends. Fadden generally means more sought-after housing, while Hume leans toward more mid-market housing value.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Fadden, while Hume remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons