Overall score
Fadden
61.6/100
Hume
16.1/100
Fadden for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Fadden
61.6/100
Hume
16.1/100
Crime rate
Fadden
8.0 / 1k
Hume
260.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Fadden
224
Hume
43
Population
Fadden
3,006
Hume
395
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Fadden | Hume |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.6/100 | 16.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 56.8/100 | 0.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 8.0 / 1k | 260.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | — |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 6.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 224 | 43 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 7 |
| Green cover | 35.8% | 0.3% |
| Population | 3,006 | 395 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | — |
Fadden reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Hume is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm.
Fadden pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability, whereas Hume is the better pick for recognised heritage character and improving crime trends. Fadden generally means more sought-after housing, while Hume leans toward more mid-market housing value.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Fadden, while Hume remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.