Fadden vs Hume, ACT suburb comparison

Fadden for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FaddenHume

Overall score

Fadden

60.2/100

Hume

26.7/100

Crime rate

Fadden

8.0 / 1k

Hume

260.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fadden

223

Hume

41

Population

Fadden

3,006

Hume

395

Metric leadFadden 7Hume 0across 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFaddenHume
Overall score60.2/10026.7/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/1000.5/100
Crime rate8.0 / 1k260.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools5
Parks & reserves3
Walkability30.0/1006.5/100
Nearby amenities22341
Planning activity36
Population3,006395
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/10

Comparison summary

Fadden reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Hume is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm.

Fadden pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Hume is the better pick for recognised heritage character. Fadden generally means more sought-after housing, while Hume leans toward more mid-market housing value.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Fadden, while Hume remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons