Overall score
Fairview Park
57.7/100
Tea Tree Gully
57.7/100
Tea Tree Gully for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Fairview Park
57.7/100
Tea Tree Gully
57.7/100
Crime rate
Fairview Park
17.9 / 1k
Tea Tree Gully
20.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Fairview Park
78
Tea Tree Gully
122
Population
Fairview Park
3,792
Tea Tree Gully
3,499
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Fairview Park | Tea Tree Gully |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 57.7/100 | 57.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 64.0/100 | 70.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 17.9 / 1k | 20.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 24 | 23 |
| Walkability | 80.0/100 | 50.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 78 | 122 |
| Planning activity | 59 | 55 |
| Green cover | 7.0% | 34.0% |
| Population | 3,792 | 3,499 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 7/10 |
Fairview Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Tea Tree Gully is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Tea Tree Gully sits among greener hillside streets, while Fairview Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Fairview Park is stronger for a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability; Tea Tree Gully answers with housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and tree cover and green space.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Fairview Park, while Tea Tree Gully remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.