Fairview Park vs Tea Tree Gully, SA Suburb Comparison

Tea Tree Gully for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Fairview ParkTea Tree Gully

Overall score

Fairview Park

57.7/100

Tea Tree Gully

57.7/100

Crime rate

Fairview Park

17.9 / 1k

Tea Tree Gully

20.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fairview Park

78

Tea Tree Gully

122

Population

Fairview Park

3,792

Tea Tree Gully

3,499

Metric leadFairview Park 4Tea Tree Gully 44 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFairview ParkTea Tree Gully
Overall score57.7/10057.7/100
Housing (desirability)64.0/10070.8/100
Crime rate17.9 / 1k20.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools33
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Parks & reserves—2
Public transport stops2423
Walkability80.0/10050.0/100
Nearby amenities78122
Planning activity5955
Green cover7.0%34.0%
Population3,7923,499
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/107/10

Comparison summary

Fairview Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Tea Tree Gully is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Tea Tree Gully sits among greener hillside streets, while Fairview Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Fairview Park is stronger for a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability; Tea Tree Gully answers with housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and tree cover and green space.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Fairview Park, while Tea Tree Gully remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons