Overall score
Falcon
42.8/100
Halls Head
48.8/100
Falcon vs Halls Head, WA suburb comparison
Falcon for families; Halls Head for beach lifestyle and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
FalconHalls Head
Crime rate
Falcon
2533.0 / 1k
Halls Head
957.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Falcon
54
Halls Head
86
Population
Falcon
5,531
Halls Head
14,474
Metric leadFalcon 0Halls Head 10across 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesFalcon
- Best for beach lifestyleHalls Head
- Best for investmentHalls Head
- Best for best valueHalls Head
- Best for best schoolsHalls Head
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Falcon | Halls Head |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 42.8/100 | 48.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 26.4/100 | 40.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 2533.0 / 1k | 957.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 16 |
| Public transport stops | 48 | 86 |
| Walkability | 59.0/100 | 69.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 54 | 86 |
| Population | 5,531 | 14,474 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Falcon reads as a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm; Halls Head is a beachside established suburb where the coast sets the tone.
Falcon pulls ahead on overall desirability, whereas Halls Head is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Falcon sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Halls Head.
Choose Falcon if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Halls Head for people chasing a beach lifestyle and investors.