Falcon vs Halls Head, WA Suburb Comparison

Falcon for families and beach lifestyle; Halls Head for retirees and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FalconHalls Head

Overall score

Falcon

42.1/100

Halls Head

40.5/100

Crime rate

Falcon

59.7 / 1k

Halls Head

59.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Falcon

91

Halls Head

149

Population

Falcon

5,531

Halls Head

14,474

Metric leadFalcon 3Halls Head 72 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFalconHalls Head
Overall score42.1/10040.5/100
Housing (desirability)50.2/10043.2/100
Crime rate59.7 / 1k59.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools14
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves516
Public transport stops4886
Walkability88.0/10084.0/100
Nearby amenities91149
Green cover2.2%6.3%
Population5,53114,474
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/105/10

Comparison summary

Falcon reads as a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm; Halls Head is a beachside established suburb where the coast sets the tone.

Falcon pulls ahead on walkability, whereas Halls Head is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.

Choose Falcon if you are weighing families; lean toward Halls Head for people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons