Falcon vs Mandurah, WA Suburb Comparison

Falcon for families and schools; Mandurah for retirees and beach lifestyle.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FalconMandurah

Overall score

Falcon

42.1/100

Mandurah

42.2/100

Crime rate

Falcon

61.4 / 1k

Mandurah

61.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Falcon

91

Mandurah

346

Population

Falcon

5,531

Mandurah

8,804

Metric leadFalcon 3Mandurah 72 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFalconMandurah
Overall score42.1/10042.2/100
Housing (desirability)50.2/10054.0/100
Crime rate61.4 / 1k61.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools14
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves53
Public transport stops4894
Walkability88.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities91346
Green cover2.2%2.0%
Population5,5318,804
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Falcon is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm, and Mandurah is a coastal established suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living.

On the data, Falcon is stronger for parks and reserves, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage; Mandurah answers with housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access.

Retirees may find Falcon the better fit, while people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mandurah.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons