Farley vs Rutherford, NSW suburb comparison

Rutherford for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FarleyRutherford

Overall score

Farley

22.1/100

Rutherford

61.7/100

Crime rate

Farley

95.7 / 1k

Rutherford

95.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Farley

2

Rutherford

375

Population

Farley

605

Rutherford

13,091

Metric leadFarley 2Rutherford 7across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFarleyRutherford
Overall score22.1/10061.7/100
Housing (desirability)43.4/10076.1/100
Crime rate95.7 / 1k95.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools3
Parks & reserves4
Public transport stops6262
Walkability9.0/10085.0/100
Nearby amenities2375
Planning activity1557
Population60513,091
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Farley is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city, and Rutherford is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Farley sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Rutherford is in a middle-ring position.

Farley tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, while Rutherford stands out for housing affordability and public transport access. On housing, Farley sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Rutherford.

On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Rutherford, while Farley remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons