Overall score
Farley
37.1/100
Rutherford
39.9/100
Farley for schools; Rutherford for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Farley
37.1/100
Rutherford
39.9/100
Crime rate
Farley
95.7 / 1k
Rutherford
95.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Farley
4
Rutherford
376
Population
Farley
605
Rutherford
13,091
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Farley | Rutherford |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 37.1/100 | 39.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 36.5/100 | 64.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 95.7 / 1k | 95.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 60.5/100 | 60.5/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 6 | 262 |
| Walkability | 9.0/100 | 85.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 4 | 376 |
| Planning activity | 17 | 61 |
| Green cover | 26.3% | 4.5% |
| Population | 605 | 13,091 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Farley is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand, and Rutherford is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Farley sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Rutherford is in a middle-ring position.
Farley tends to lead on a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Rutherford stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access.
On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Rutherford, while Farley remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.