Overall score
Farley
22.1/100
Rutherford
61.7/100
Rutherford for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Farley
22.1/100
Rutherford
61.7/100
Crime rate
Farley
95.7 / 1k
Rutherford
95.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Farley
2
Rutherford
375
Population
Farley
605
Rutherford
13,091
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Farley | Rutherford |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 22.1/100 | 61.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 43.4/100 | 76.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 95.7 / 1k | 95.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 6 | 262 |
| Walkability | 9.0/100 | 85.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 375 |
| Planning activity | 15 | 57 |
| Population | 605 | 13,091 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Farley is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city, and Rutherford is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Farley sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Rutherford is in a middle-ring position.
Farley tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, while Rutherford stands out for housing affordability and public transport access. On housing, Farley sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Rutherford.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Rutherford, while Farley remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.