Overall score
Farley
22.1/100
Gillieston Heights
50.1/100
Gillieston Heights for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Farley
22.1/100
Gillieston Heights
50.1/100
Crime rate
Farley
95.7 / 1k
Gillieston Heights
46.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Farley
2
Gillieston Heights
42
Population
Farley
605
Gillieston Heights
4,796
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Farley | Gillieston Heights |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 22.1/100 | 50.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 43.4/100 | 74.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 95.7 / 1k | 46.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 6 | 47 |
| Walkability | 9.0/100 | 78.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 42 |
| Planning activity | 15 | 38 |
| Population | 605 | 4,796 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 5/10 |
Farley reads as a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city; Gillieston Heights is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Gillieston Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Farley keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Farley is stronger for a calmer planning outlook; Gillieston Heights answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Gillieston Heights, while Farley remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.