Gillieston Heights vs Louth Park, NSW Suburb Comparison

Gillieston Heights for retirees and investment; Louth Park for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Gillieston HeightsLouth Park

Overall score

Gillieston Heights

39.3/100

Louth Park

38.1/100

Crime rate

Gillieston Heights

46.4 / 1k

Louth Park

95.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Gillieston Heights

43

Louth Park

11

Population

Gillieston Heights

4,796

Louth Park

922

Metric leadGillieston Heights 7Louth Park 31 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGillieston HeightsLouth Park
Overall score39.3/10038.1/100
Housing (desirability)56.1/10040.4/100
Crime rate46.4 / 1k95.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves4—
Public transport stops476
Walkability78.0/1009.0/100
Nearby amenities4311
Planning activity4523
Green cover1.2%3.1%
Population4,796922
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/1010/10

Comparison summary

Gillieston Heights is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks, while Louth Park is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm. Gillieston Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Louth Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Gillieston Heights tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability, while Louth Park stands out for housing affordability, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Gillieston Heights suits families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Louth Park is the stronger match for retirees.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons