Finniss vs Tooperang, SA Suburb Comparison

Finniss for families and investment; Tooperang for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FinnissTooperang

Overall score

Finniss

37.9/100

Tooperang

30.7/100

Crime rate

Finniss

19.2 / 1k

Tooperang

13.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Finniss

4

Tooperang

3

Population

Finniss

293

Tooperang

271

Metric leadFinniss 5Tooperang 23 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFinnissTooperang
Overall score37.9/10030.7/100
Housing (desirability)52.1/10041.5/100
Crime rate19.2 / 1k13.8 / 1k
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities43
Planning activity63
Green cover0.1%0.0%
Population293271
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Finniss is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Tooperang is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Finniss pulls ahead on nearby cafés and amenities, tree cover and green space, and a larger local community, whereas Tooperang is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability.

Investors may find Finniss the better fit, while retirees, families, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Tooperang.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons