Overall score
Mount Compass
40.7/100
Tooperang
30.7/100
Mount Compass for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mount Compass
40.7/100
Tooperang
30.7/100
Crime rate
Mount Compass
8.9 / 1k
Tooperang
13.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Compass
7
Tooperang
3
Population
Mount Compass
1,580
Tooperang
271
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Compass | Tooperang |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 40.7/100 | 30.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.2/100 | 41.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 8.9 / 1k | 13.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 56.4/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 2 | — |
| Walkability | 5.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 7 | 3 |
| Planning activity | 38 | 3 |
| Green cover | 0.5% | 0.0% |
| Population | 1,580 | 271 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 6/10 |
Put side by side, Mount Compass is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Tooperang is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe. Mount Compass sits among greener hillside streets, while Tooperang keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Mount Compass is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability; Tooperang answers with overall desirability, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Choose Mount Compass if you are weighing investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Tooperang for families.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.