Flynn vs Macgregor, ACT suburb comparison

Flynn for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FlynnMacgregor

Overall score

Flynn

63.0/100

Macgregor

57.5/100

Crime rate

Flynn

5.2 / 1k

Macgregor

13.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Flynn

59

Macgregor

97

Population

Flynn

3,671

Macgregor

7,049

Metric leadFlynn 4Macgregor 32 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFlynnMacgregor
Overall score63.0/10057.5/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate5.2 / 1k13.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools72
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities5997
Planning activity63
Population3,6717,049
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Flynn is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Macgregor is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Flynn tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, while Macgregor stands out for nearby cafés and amenities and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Flynn, while Macgregor remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons