Charnwood vs Macgregor, ACT suburb comparison

Macgregor for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CharnwoodMacgregor

Overall score

Charnwood

62.9/100

Macgregor

57.5/100

Crime rate

Charnwood

28.7 / 1k

Macgregor

13.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Charnwood

194

Macgregor

97

Population

Charnwood

3,055

Macgregor

7,049

Metric leadCharnwood 4Macgregor 32 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCharnwoodMacgregor
Overall score62.9/10057.5/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate28.7 / 1k13.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools32
Parks & reserves5
Walkability96.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities19497
Planning activity33
Population3,0557,049
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Charnwood is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Macgregor is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Charnwood tends to lead on schools and education options and walkability, while Macgregor stands out for a quieter safety profile and a larger local community. Charnwood generally means more mid-market housing value, while Macgregor leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Macgregor, while Charnwood remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons