Latham vs Macgregor, ACT suburb comparison

Latham for families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LathamMacgregor

Overall score

Latham

62.8/100

Macgregor

57.5/100

Crime rate

Latham

10.5 / 1k

Macgregor

13.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Latham

89

Macgregor

97

Population

Latham

3,767

Macgregor

7,049

Metric leadLatham 5Macgregor 31 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLathamMacgregor
Overall score62.8/10057.5/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate10.5 / 1k13.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools92
Walkability59.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities8997
Planning activity23
Population3,7677,049
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Latham is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Macgregor is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Latham pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, whereas Macgregor is the better pick for nearby cafés and amenities and a larger local community. On housing, Latham sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Macgregor.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Macgregor, while Latham remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons