Latham vs Melba, ACT suburb comparison

Latham for investment; Melba for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LathamMelba

Overall score

Latham

62.8/100

Melba

67.3/100

Crime rate

Latham

10.5 / 1k

Melba

12.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Latham

89

Melba

113

Population

Latham

3,767

Melba

3,383

Metric leadLatham 4Melba 41 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLathamMelba
Overall score62.8/10067.3/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate10.5 / 1k12.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools96
Walkability59.0/10061.0/100
Nearby amenities89113
Planning activity23
Population3,7673,383
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/109/10

Comparison summary

Latham reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Melba is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Latham is stronger for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options; Melba answers with walkability and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Latham sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Melba.

Investors may find Latham the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Melba.

Related comparisons