Overall score
Flynn
54.9/100
Spence
56.0/100
Flynn for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Flynn
54.9/100
Spence
56.0/100
Crime rate
Flynn
5.2 / 1k
Spence
23.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Flynn
65
Spence
72
Population
Flynn
3,671
Spence
2,587
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Flynn | Spence |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.9/100 | 56.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 51.4/100 | 61.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 5.2 / 1k | 23.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 74.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 65 | 72 |
| Planning activity | 6 | 2 |
| Green cover | 13.1% | 4.0% |
| Population | 3,671 | 2,587 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Flynn reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Spence is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Flynn tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and overall desirability, while Spence stands out for walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Flynn, while Spence remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.