Overall score
Flynn
54.9/100
Macgregor
45.4/100
Flynn vs Macgregor, ACT Suburb Comparison
Flynn for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
FlynnMacgregor
Crime rate
Flynn
5.2 / 1k
Macgregor
13.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Flynn
65
Macgregor
96
Population
Flynn
3,671
Macgregor
7,049
Metric leadFlynn 5Macgregor 42 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Flynn | Macgregor |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.9/100 | 45.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 51.4/100 | 59.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 5.2 / 1k | 13.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 65 | 96 |
| Planning activity | 6 | 3 |
| Green cover | 13.1% | 9.5% |
| Population | 3,671 | 7,049 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Flynn is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Macgregor is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Flynn tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and overall desirability, while Macgregor stands out for nearby cafés and amenities, a calmer planning outlook, and a larger local community.
On balance, retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Flynn, while Macgregor remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.