Overall score
Latham
55.5/100
Macgregor
45.4/100
Latham for retirees and investment; Macgregor for families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Latham
55.5/100
Macgregor
45.4/100
Crime rate
Latham
10.5 / 1k
Macgregor
13.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Latham
94
Macgregor
96
Population
Latham
3,767
Macgregor
7,049
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Latham | Macgregor |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 55.5/100 | 45.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 64.7/100 | 59.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 10.5 / 1k | 13.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 9 | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Walkability | 59.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 94 | 96 |
| Planning activity | 2 | 3 |
| Green cover | 18.5% | 9.5% |
| Population | 3,767 | 7,049 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 9/10 |
Put side by side, Latham is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Macgregor is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Latham pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and walkability, whereas Macgregor is the better pick for nearby cafés and amenities, a larger local community, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Latham sits in a gently premium band, compared with a expensive feel in Macgregor.
On balance, families are more likely to prefer Latham, while Macgregor remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.