Overall score
Forest Glen
53.6/100
Kiels Mountain
43.0/100
Forest Glen vs Kiels Mountain, QLD suburb comparison
Forest Glen for families and value; Kiels Mountain for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Forest GlenKiels Mountain
Crime rate
Forest Glen
13.8 / 1k
Kiels Mountain
17.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Forest Glen
25
Kiels Mountain
1
Population
Forest Glen
1,657
Kiels Mountain
714
Metric leadForest Glen 6Kiels Mountain 11 tiedacross 8 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesKiels Mountain
- Best for familiesForest Glen
- Best for best valueForest Glen
- Best for best schoolsForest Glen
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Forest Glen | Kiels Mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 53.6/100 | 43.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 13.8 / 1k | 17.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 9 | — |
| Walkability | 53.5/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 25 | 1 |
| Population | 1,657 | 714 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Forest Glen reads as a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city; Kiels Mountain is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Kiels Mountain sits among greener hillside streets, while Forest Glen keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Forest Glen is stronger for a quieter safety profile and walkability; Kiels Mountain answers with stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Choose Forest Glen if you are weighing value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools; lean toward Kiels Mountain for retirees and families.