Overall score
Forest Glen
53.6/100
Mons
37.6/100
Forest Glen vs Mons, QLD suburb comparison
Forest Glen for value and schools; Mons for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Forest GlenMons
Crime rate
Forest Glen
13.8 / 1k
Mons
13.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Forest Glen
25
Mons
10
Population
Forest Glen
1,657
Mons
1,179
Metric leadForest Glen 5Mons 22 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesMons
- Best for familiesMons
- Best for best valueForest Glen
- Best for best schoolsForest Glen
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Forest Glen | Mons |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 53.6/100 | 37.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 13.8 / 1k | 13.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 9 | 2 |
| Walkability | 53.5/100 | 3.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 25 | 10 |
| Population | 1,657 | 1,179 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Forest Glen reads as a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city; Mons is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel.
Forest Glen tends to lead on public transport access and walkability, while Mons stands out for a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Choose Forest Glen if you are weighing value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools; lean toward Mons for retirees and families.