Overall score
Forest Lake
72.9/100
Heathwood
53.0/100
Forest Lake for families and value; Heathwood for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Forest Lake
72.9/100
Heathwood
53.0/100
Crime rate
Forest Lake
28.7 / 1k
Heathwood
59.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Forest Lake
257
Heathwood
59
Population
Forest Lake
22,676
Heathwood
4,944
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Forest Lake | Heathwood |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 72.9/100 | 53.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 28.7 / 1k | 59.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 43 | 14 |
| Walkability | 92.0/100 | 29.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 257 | 59 |
| Population | 22,676 | 4,944 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 9/10 |
Put side by side, Forest Lake is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Heathwood is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Forest Lake is stronger for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves; Heathwood answers with stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Families and value-focused buyers may find Forest Lake the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Heathwood.