Overall score
Forest Lake
51.8/100
Springfield Lakes
40.7/100
Forest Lake for retirees and investment; Springfield Lakes for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Forest Lake
51.8/100
Springfield Lakes
40.7/100
Crime rate
Forest Lake
46.4 / 1k
Springfield Lakes
55.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Forest Lake
260
Springfield Lakes
133
Population
Forest Lake
22,676
Springfield Lakes
17,211
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Forest Lake | Springfield Lakes |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.8/100 | 40.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.5/100 | 32.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 46.4 / 1k | 55.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 7 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 27 |
| Public transport stops | 43 | 34 |
| Walkability | 92.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 260 | 133 |
| Green cover | 2.3% | 13.5% |
| Population | 22,676 | 17,211 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 8/10 |
Put side by side, Forest Lake is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Springfield Lakes is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Forest Lake tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access, while Springfield Lakes stands out for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Forest Lake the better fit, while retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Springfield Lakes.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.