Ipswich vs Springfield Lakes, QLD Suburb Comparison

Ipswich for retirees and investment; Springfield Lakes for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

IpswichSpringfield Lakes

Overall score

Ipswich

52.1/100

Springfield Lakes

40.7/100

Crime rate

Ipswich

92.9 / 1k

Springfield Lakes

55.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ipswich

511

Springfield Lakes

133

Population

Ipswich

2,468

Springfield Lakes

17,211

Metric leadIpswich 6Springfield Lakes 51 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryIpswichSpringfield Lakes
Overall score52.1/10040.7/100
Housing (desirability)39.3/10032.7/100
Crime rate92.9 / 1k55.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools137
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves1127
Public transport stops4234
Walkability100.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities511133
Green cover12.6%13.5%
Population2,46817,211
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/108/10

Comparison summary

Ipswich reads as a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby; Springfield Lakes is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Ipswich is stronger for schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability; Springfield Lakes answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves. Ipswich generally means more approachable housing costs, while Springfield Lakes leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Springfield Lakes, while Ipswich remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons