Overall score
Ipswich
54.3/100
Springfield Lakes
53.3/100
Springfield Lakes for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Ipswich
54.3/100
Springfield Lakes
53.3/100
Crime rate
Ipswich
57.1 / 1k
Springfield Lakes
32.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Ipswich
461
Springfield Lakes
131
Population
Ipswich
2,468
Springfield Lakes
17,211
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Ipswich | Springfield Lakes |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.3/100 | 53.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 18.4/100 | 40.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 57.1 / 1k | 32.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 13 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 11 | 27 |
| Public transport stops | 42 | 34 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 461 | 131 |
| Population | 2,468 | 17,211 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 8/10 |
Ipswich reads as a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby; Springfield Lakes is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Ipswich is stronger for schools and education options and public transport access; Springfield Lakes answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Ipswich generally means more approachable housing costs, while Springfield Lakes leans toward more sought-after housing.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Springfield Lakes, while Ipswich remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.