Forrestfield vs High Wycombe, WA suburb comparison

Forrestfield for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ForrestfieldHigh Wycombe

Overall score

Forrestfield

65.9/100

High Wycombe

63.4/100

Crime rate

Forrestfield

748.0 / 1k

High Wycombe

724.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Forrestfield

229

High Wycombe

257

Population

Forrestfield

13,181

High Wycombe

12,198

Metric leadForrestfield 6High Wycombe 31 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryForrestfieldHigh Wycombe
Overall score65.9/10063.4/100
Housing (desirability)51.4/10047.6/100
Crime rate748.0 / 1k724.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools63
Parks & reserves3727
Public transport stops8772
Walkability76.0/10096.0/100
Nearby amenities229257
Population13,18112,198
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Forrestfield is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and High Wycombe is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Forrestfield is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; High Wycombe answers with walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Forrestfield, while High Wycombe remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons