Forrestfield vs High Wycombe, WA Suburb Comparison

Forrestfield for schools; High Wycombe for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ForrestfieldHigh Wycombe

Overall score

Forrestfield

56.4/100

High Wycombe

55.9/100

Crime rate

Forrestfield

43.1 / 1k

High Wycombe

43.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Forrestfield

509

High Wycombe

365

Population

Forrestfield

13,181

High Wycombe

12,198

Metric leadForrestfield 8High Wycombe 13 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryForrestfieldHigh Wycombe
Overall score56.4/10055.9/100
Housing (desirability)59.5/10054.3/100
Crime rate43.1 / 1k43.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools63
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves3727
Public transport stops8772
Walkability96.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities509365
Green cover29.3%13.3%
Population13,18112,198
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Forrestfield is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and High Wycombe is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Forrestfield is stronger for housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves; High Wycombe answers with walkability.

On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Forrestfield, while High Wycombe remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons