High Wycombe vs Kalamunda, WA Suburb Comparison

High Wycombe for families; Kalamunda for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

High WycombeKalamunda

Overall score

High Wycombe

55.9/100

Kalamunda

68.4/100

Crime rate

High Wycombe

43.1 / 1k

Kalamunda

43.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

High Wycombe

365

Kalamunda

401

Population

High Wycombe

12,198

Kalamunda

7,163

Metric leadHigh Wycombe 3Kalamunda 63 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHigh WycombeKalamunda
Overall score55.9/10068.4/100
Housing (desirability)54.3/10058.1/100
Crime rate43.1 / 1k43.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools36
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves2718
Public transport stops7260
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities365401
Green cover13.3%33.1%
Population12,1987,163
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, High Wycombe is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Kalamunda is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

High Wycombe pulls ahead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas Kalamunda is the better pick for schools and education options, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability.

Investors may find High Wycombe the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kalamunda.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons