High Wycombe vs Kalamunda, WA suburb comparison

High Wycombe for investment; Kalamunda for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

High WycombeKalamunda

Overall score

High Wycombe

63.4/100

Kalamunda

67.5/100

Crime rate

High Wycombe

724.4 / 1k

Kalamunda

1378.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

High Wycombe

257

Kalamunda

295

Population

High Wycombe

12,198

Kalamunda

7,163

Metric leadHigh Wycombe 5Kalamunda 5across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHigh WycombeKalamunda
Overall score63.4/10067.5/100
Housing (desirability)47.6/10042.4/100
Crime rate724.4 / 1k1378.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools36
Parks & reserves2718
Public transport stops7260
Walkability96.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities257295
Population12,1987,163
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, High Wycombe is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Kalamunda is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

High Wycombe pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Kalamunda is the better pick for schools and education options and walkability.

Retirees and families may find High Wycombe the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kalamunda.

Related comparisons