Overall score
High Wycombe
63.4/100
Kalamunda
67.5/100
High Wycombe for investment; Kalamunda for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
High Wycombe
63.4/100
Kalamunda
67.5/100
Crime rate
High Wycombe
724.4 / 1k
Kalamunda
1378.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
High Wycombe
257
Kalamunda
295
Population
High Wycombe
12,198
Kalamunda
7,163
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | High Wycombe | Kalamunda |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 63.4/100 | 67.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.6/100 | 42.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 724.4 / 1k | 1378.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 27 | 18 |
| Public transport stops | 72 | 60 |
| Walkability | 96.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 257 | 295 |
| Population | 12,198 | 7,163 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 9/10 |
Put side by side, High Wycombe is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Kalamunda is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
High Wycombe pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Kalamunda is the better pick for schools and education options and walkability.
Retirees and families may find High Wycombe the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kalamunda.