Carmel vs Kalamunda, WA suburb comparison

Carmel for investment and value; Kalamunda for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CarmelKalamunda

Overall score

Carmel

48.2/100

Kalamunda

67.6/100

Crime rate

Carmel

13203.5 / 1k

Kalamunda

1378.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Carmel

13

Kalamunda

295

Population

Carmel

754

Kalamunda

7,163

Metric leadCarmel 1Kalamunda 71 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCarmelKalamunda
Overall score48.2/10067.6/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10042.4/100
Crime rate13203.5 / 1k1378.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools26
Parks & reserves218
Public transport stops60
Walkability2.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities13295
Population7547,163
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Carmel is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, and Kalamunda is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Carmel sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Kalamunda is in a middle-ring position.

Carmel pulls ahead on housing affordability, whereas Kalamunda is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options.

Choose Carmel if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Kalamunda for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons