Carmel vs Kalamunda, WA Suburb Comparison

Carmel for value and schools; Kalamunda for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CarmelKalamunda

Overall score

Carmel

51.0/100

Kalamunda

68.4/100

Crime rate

Carmel

43.1 / 1k

Kalamunda

43.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Carmel

35

Kalamunda

401

Population

Carmel

754

Kalamunda

7,163

Metric leadCarmel 1Kalamunda 73 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCarmelKalamunda
Overall score51.0/10068.4/100
Housing (desirability)40.7/10058.1/100
Crime rate43.1 / 1k43.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools26
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves218
Public transport stops—60
Walkability4.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities35401
Green cover56.1%33.1%
Population7547,163
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Carmel is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, and Kalamunda is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Carmel sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Kalamunda is in a middle-ring position.

Carmel pulls ahead on housing affordability, whereas Kalamunda is the better pick for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and walkability.

Choose Carmel if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Kalamunda for families and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons