Overall score
Bickley
52.6/100
Carmel
51.0/100
Bickley vs Carmel, WA Suburb Comparison
Bickley for families and investment; Carmel for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BickleyCarmel
Crime rate
Bickley
43.1 / 1k
Carmel
43.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bickley
12
Carmel
35
Population
Bickley
713
Carmel
754
Metric leadBickley 3Carmel 43 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bickley | Carmel |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.6/100 | 51.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 52.3/100 | 40.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 43.1 / 1k | 43.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 2 |
| Walkability | 2.0/100 | 4.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 12 | 35 |
| Green cover | 46.0% | 56.1% |
| Population | 713 | 754 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Bickley reads as a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand; Carmel is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.
Bickley pulls ahead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Carmel is the better pick for walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability.
On balance, retirees are more likely to prefer Bickley, while Carmel remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.