Bickley vs Carmel, WA suburb comparison

Bickley for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BickleyCarmel

Overall score

Bickley

45.9/100

Carmel

48.2/100

Crime rate

Bickley

13957.5 / 1k

Carmel

13203.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bickley

4

Carmel

13

Population

Bickley

713

Carmel

754

Metric leadBickley 1Carmel 43 tiedacross 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBickleyCarmel
Overall score45.9/10048.2/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate13957.5 / 1k13203.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools22
Parks & reserves2
Walkability2.0/1002.0/100
Nearby amenities413
Population713754
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Bickley reads as a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm; Carmel is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel.

Bickley pulls ahead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Carmel is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Bickley, while Carmel remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons