Bickley vs Lesmurdie, WA suburb comparison

Bickley for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BickleyLesmurdie

Overall score

Bickley

45.9/100

Lesmurdie

61.7/100

Crime rate

Bickley

13957.5 / 1k

Lesmurdie

1181.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bickley

4

Lesmurdie

127

Population

Bickley

713

Lesmurdie

8,413

Metric leadBickley 2Lesmurdie 6across 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBickleyLesmurdie
Overall score45.9/10061.7/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10046.5/100
Crime rate13957.5 / 1k1181.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools25
Parks & reserves33
Public transport stops66
Walkability2.0/10076.0/100
Nearby amenities4127
Population7138,413
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Bickley reads as a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm; Lesmurdie is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Bickley sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Lesmurdie is in a middle-ring position.

Bickley pulls ahead on housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Lesmurdie is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Bickley the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Lesmurdie.

Related comparisons