Bickley vs Lesmurdie, WA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Bickley | Lesmurdie |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 37.0/100 | 53.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 46.5/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 33 |
| Public transport stops | — | 66 |
| Walkability | 2.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 4 | 127 |
| Population | 713 | 8,413 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Quick verdicts
Comparison summary
Bickley reads as a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm; Lesmurdie is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Bickley sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Lesmurdie is in a middle-ring position.
Bickley pulls ahead on housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Lesmurdie is the better pick for schools and education options and walkability.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Bickley the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Lesmurdie.