Bickley vs Lesmurdie, WA Suburb Comparison

Bickley for families and investment; Lesmurdie for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BickleyLesmurdie

Overall score

Bickley

52.6/100

Lesmurdie

62.2/100

Crime rate

Bickley

43.1 / 1k

Lesmurdie

43.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bickley

12

Lesmurdie

202

Population

Bickley

713

Lesmurdie

8,413

Metric leadBickley 3Lesmurdie 52 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBickleyLesmurdie
Overall score52.6/10062.2/100
Housing (desirability)52.3/10041.2/100
Crime rate43.1 / 1k43.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools25
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves—33
Public transport stops—66
Walkability2.0/10076.0/100
Nearby amenities12202
Green cover46.0%34.7%
Population7138,413
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Bickley reads as a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand; Lesmurdie is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Bickley sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Lesmurdie is in a middle-ring position.

Bickley pulls ahead on housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Lesmurdie is the better pick for schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Bickley, while Lesmurdie remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons