Bickley vs Kalamunda, WA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Bickley | Kalamunda |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 37.0/100 | 58.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 42.4/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 18 |
| Public transport stops | — | 60 |
| Walkability | 2.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 4 | 295 |
| Population | 713 | 7,163 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Quick verdicts
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Bickley is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm, and Kalamunda is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Bickley sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Kalamunda is in a middle-ring position.
Bickley pulls ahead on housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Kalamunda is the better pick for schools and education options and walkability.
Bickley suits retirees and investors more clearly, whereas Kalamunda is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.