Overall score
Bickley
45.9/100
Kalamunda
67.6/100
Bickley vs Kalamunda, WA suburb comparison
Bickley for retirees and investment; Kalamunda for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BickleyKalamunda
Crime rate
Bickley
13957.5 / 1k
Kalamunda
1378.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bickley
4
Kalamunda
295
Population
Bickley
713
Kalamunda
7,163
Metric leadBickley 2Kalamunda 6across 8 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Bickley is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm, and Kalamunda is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Bickley sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Kalamunda is in a middle-ring position.
Bickley pulls ahead on housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Kalamunda is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options.
Bickley suits retirees and investors more clearly, whereas Kalamunda is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.