Kalamunda vs Walliston, WA Suburb Comparison

Kalamunda for retirees; Walliston for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KalamundaWalliston

Overall score

Kalamunda

68.4/100

Walliston

58.5/100

Crime rate

Kalamunda

43.1 / 1k

Walliston

43.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kalamunda

401

Walliston

60

Population

Kalamunda

7,163

Walliston

1,016

Metric leadKalamunda 9Walliston 12 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKalamundaWalliston
Overall score68.4/10058.5/100
Housing (desirability)58.1/10057.4/100
Crime rate43.1 / 1k43.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools63
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves182
Public transport stops6015
Walkability100.0/10049.5/100
Nearby amenities40160
Green cover33.1%37.7%
Population7,1631,016
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/108/10

Comparison summary

Kalamunda is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Walliston is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap.

Kalamunda pulls ahead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas Walliston is the better pick for housing affordability.

Choose Kalamunda if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Walliston for investors and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons