Overall score
Kalamunda
68.4/100
Walliston
58.5/100
Kalamunda for retirees; Walliston for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kalamunda
68.4/100
Walliston
58.5/100
Crime rate
Kalamunda
43.1 / 1k
Walliston
43.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kalamunda
401
Walliston
60
Population
Kalamunda
7,163
Walliston
1,016
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kalamunda | Walliston |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 68.4/100 | 58.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 58.1/100 | 57.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 43.1 / 1k | 43.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 18 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 60 | 15 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 49.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 401 | 60 |
| Green cover | 33.1% | 37.7% |
| Population | 7,163 | 1,016 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 8/10 |
Kalamunda is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Walliston is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap.
Kalamunda pulls ahead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas Walliston is the better pick for housing affordability.
Choose Kalamunda if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Walliston for investors and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.