Overall score
Forreston
39.3/100
Kersbrook
44.4/100
Kersbrook for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Forreston
39.3/100
Kersbrook
44.4/100
Crime rate
Forreston
18.2 / 1k
Kersbrook
15.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Forreston
4
Kersbrook
20
Population
Forreston
407
Kersbrook
1,116
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Forreston | Kersbrook |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.3/100 | 44.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 38.6/100 | 64.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 18.2 / 1k | 15.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 2 | 2 |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 3.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 4 | 20 |
| Planning activity | 1 | 36 |
| Green cover | 8.2% | 3.6% |
| Population | 407 | 1,116 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 8/10 |
Put side by side, Forreston is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Kersbrook is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace.
Forreston tends to lead on tree cover and green space, plus a calmer planning outlook, while Kersbrook stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and nearby cafés and amenities.
Forreston suits families more clearly, whereas Kersbrook is the stronger match for investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.