Overall score
Forreston
27.1/100
Kenton Valley
41.4/100
Forreston for investment; Kenton Valley for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Forreston
27.1/100
Kenton Valley
41.4/100
Crime rate
Forreston
18.2 / 1k
Kenton Valley
14.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Forreston
1
Kenton Valley
10
Population
Forreston
407
Kenton Valley
262
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Forreston | Kenton Valley |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 27.1/100 | 41.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 43.4/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 18.2 / 1k | 14.1 / 1k |
| Public transport stops | 2 | 1 |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 1.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 10 |
| Planning activity | 1 | 3 |
| Population | 407 | 262 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 8/10 |
Forreston is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Kenton Valley is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks.
Forreston pulls ahead on public transport access and walkability, whereas Kenton Valley is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Kenton Valley, while Forreston remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.