Overall score
Kenton Valley
47.3/100
Lobethal
57.2/100
Kenton Valley vs Lobethal, SA Suburb Comparison
Lobethal for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Kenton ValleyLobethal
Crime rate
Kenton Valley
14.1 / 1k
Lobethal
12.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kenton Valley
13
Lobethal
73
Population
Kenton Valley
262
Lobethal
2,534
Metric leadKenton Valley 3Lobethal 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kenton Valley | Lobethal |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.3/100 | 57.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 54.8/100 | 64.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 14.1 / 1k | 12.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 1 | 17 |
| Walkability | 1.5/100 | 58.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 13 | 73 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 49 |
| Green cover | 10.5% | 1.1% |
| Population | 262 | 2,534 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Kenton Valley reads as a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks; Lobethal is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood.
On the data, Kenton Valley is stronger for tree cover and green space, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Lobethal answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access. On housing, Kenton Valley sits in a gently premium band, compared with a expensive feel in Lobethal.
Kenton Valley suits retirees more clearly, whereas Lobethal is the stronger match for investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.