Charleston vs Lobethal, SA Suburb Comparison

Lobethal for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CharlestonLobethal

Overall score

Charleston

50.1/100

Lobethal

57.2/100

Crime rate

Charleston

1.7 / 1k

Lobethal

12.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Charleston

3

Lobethal

73

Population

Charleston

550

Lobethal

2,534

Metric leadCharleston 3Lobethal 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCharlestonLobethal
Overall score50.1/10057.2/100
Housing (desirability)59.3/10064.1/100
Crime rate1.7 / 1k12.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools—2
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops317
Walkability4.5/10058.5/100
Nearby amenities373
Planning activity1349
Green cover0.0%1.1%
Population5502,534
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/105/10

Comparison summary

Charleston reads as a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks; Lobethal is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood.

Charleston tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook, while Lobethal stands out for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Charleston suits retirees, families, and investors more clearly, whereas Lobethal is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons