Charleston vs Mount Torrens, SA Suburb Comparison

Charleston for families and investment; Mount Torrens for retirees and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CharlestonMount Torrens

Overall score

Charleston

50.1/100

Mount Torrens

47.3/100

Crime rate

Charleston

1.7 / 1k

Mount Torrens

6.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Charleston

3

Mount Torrens

6

Population

Charleston

550

Mount Torrens

768

Metric leadCharleston 5Mount Torrens 51 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCharlestonMount Torrens
Overall score50.1/10047.3/100
Housing (desirability)59.3/10042.5/100
Crime rate1.7 / 1k6.2 / 1k
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops34
Walkability4.5/1006.0/100
Nearby amenities36
Planning activity1317
Green cover0.0%2.1%
Population550768
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Charleston is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, and Mount Torrens is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks.

Charleston pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability, whereas Mount Torrens is the better pick for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Charleston suits retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Mount Torrens is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons