Overall score
Charleston
50.1/100
Mount Torrens
47.3/100
Charleston for families and investment; Mount Torrens for retirees and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Charleston
50.1/100
Mount Torrens
47.3/100
Crime rate
Charleston
1.7 / 1k
Mount Torrens
6.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Charleston
3
Mount Torrens
6
Population
Charleston
550
Mount Torrens
768
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Charleston | Mount Torrens |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.1/100 | 47.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 59.3/100 | 42.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 1.7 / 1k | 6.2 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 3 | 4 |
| Walkability | 4.5/100 | 6.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 6 |
| Planning activity | 13 | 17 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 2.1% |
| Population | 550 | 768 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 7/10 |
Put side by side, Charleston is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, and Mount Torrens is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks.
Charleston pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability, whereas Mount Torrens is the better pick for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.
Charleston suits retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Mount Torrens is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.