Overall score
Kenton Valley
47.3/100
Mount Torrens
47.3/100
Kenton Valley for families and investment; Mount Torrens for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kenton Valley
47.3/100
Mount Torrens
47.3/100
Crime rate
Kenton Valley
14.1 / 1k
Mount Torrens
6.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kenton Valley
13
Mount Torrens
6
Population
Kenton Valley
262
Mount Torrens
768
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kenton Valley | Mount Torrens |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.3/100 | 47.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 54.8/100 | 42.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 14.1 / 1k | 6.2 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 1 | 4 |
| Walkability | 1.5/100 | 6.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 13 | 6 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 17 |
| Green cover | 10.5% | 2.1% |
| Population | 262 | 768 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 7/10 |
Kenton Valley is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, while Mount Torrens is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks.
On the data, Kenton Valley is stronger for housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and tree cover and green space; Mount Torrens answers with a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability. On housing, Kenton Valley sits in a gently premium band, compared with a expensive feel in Mount Torrens.
Choose Kenton Valley if you are weighing value-focused buyers; lean toward Mount Torrens for retirees, families, investors, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.