Kenton Valley vs Mount Torrens, SA Suburb Comparison

Kenton Valley for families and investment; Mount Torrens for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Kenton ValleyMount Torrens

Overall score

Kenton Valley

47.3/100

Mount Torrens

47.3/100

Crime rate

Kenton Valley

14.1 / 1k

Mount Torrens

6.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kenton Valley

13

Mount Torrens

6

Population

Kenton Valley

262

Mount Torrens

768

Metric leadKenton Valley 5Mount Torrens 42 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKenton ValleyMount Torrens
Overall score47.3/10047.3/100
Housing (desirability)54.8/10042.5/100
Crime rate14.1 / 1k6.2 / 1k
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops14
Walkability1.5/1006.0/100
Nearby amenities136
Planning activity317
Green cover10.5%2.1%
Population262768
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/107/10

Comparison summary

Kenton Valley is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, while Mount Torrens is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks.

On the data, Kenton Valley is stronger for housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and tree cover and green space; Mount Torrens answers with a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability. On housing, Kenton Valley sits in a gently premium band, compared with a expensive feel in Mount Torrens.

Choose Kenton Valley if you are weighing value-focused buyers; lean toward Mount Torrens for retirees, families, investors, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons