Overall score
Charleston
50.1/100
Kenton Valley
47.3/100
Charleston for families and value; Kenton Valley for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Charleston
50.1/100
Kenton Valley
47.3/100
Crime rate
Charleston
1.7 / 1k
Kenton Valley
14.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Charleston
3
Kenton Valley
13
Population
Charleston
550
Kenton Valley
262
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Charleston | Kenton Valley |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.1/100 | 47.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 59.3/100 | 54.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 1.7 / 1k | 14.1 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 3 | 1 |
| Walkability | 4.5/100 | 1.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 13 |
| Planning activity | 13 | 3 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 10.5% |
| Population | 550 | 262 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 8/10 |
Put side by side, Charleston is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, and Kenton Valley is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks.
Charleston pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access, whereas Kenton Valley is the better pick for nearby cafés and amenities, tree cover and green space, and a calmer planning outlook. On housing, Charleston sits in a expensive band, compared with a gently premium feel in Kenton Valley.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Charleston, while Kenton Valley remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.