Overall score
Lobethal
62.1/100
Mount Torrens
33.9/100
Lobethal for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Lobethal
62.1/100
Mount Torrens
33.9/100
Crime rate
Lobethal
12.7 / 1k
Mount Torrens
9.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Lobethal
69
Mount Torrens
2
Population
Lobethal
2,534
Mount Torrens
768
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Lobethal | Mount Torrens |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 62.1/100 | 33.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 79.0/100 | 48.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 12.7 / 1k | 9.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Public transport stops | 17 | 4 |
| Walkability | 58.5/100 | 6.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 69 | 2 |
| Planning activity | 44 | 13 |
| Population | 2,534 | 768 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Lobethal is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Mount Torrens is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks.
Lobethal pulls ahead on housing affordability and public transport access, whereas Mount Torrens is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Lobethal, while Mount Torrens remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.