Overall score
Cudlee Creek
36.1/100
Lobethal
57.2/100
Lobethal for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Cudlee Creek
36.1/100
Lobethal
57.2/100
Crime rate
Cudlee Creek
43.7 / 1k
Lobethal
12.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cudlee Creek
8
Lobethal
73
Population
Cudlee Creek
425
Lobethal
2,534
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cudlee Creek | Lobethal |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 36.1/100 | 57.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 50.3/100 | 64.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 43.7 / 1k | 12.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 2 | 17 |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 58.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 8 | 73 |
| Planning activity | 9 | 49 |
| Green cover | 6.4% | 1.1% |
| Population | 425 | 2,534 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 5/10 |
Put side by side, Cudlee Creek is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, and Lobethal is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood.
On the data, Cudlee Creek is stronger for tree cover and green space, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Lobethal answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access.
On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Lobethal, while Cudlee Creek remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.