Cudlee Creek vs Lobethal, SA Suburb Comparison

Lobethal for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Cudlee CreekLobethal

Overall score

Cudlee Creek

36.1/100

Lobethal

57.2/100

Crime rate

Cudlee Creek

43.7 / 1k

Lobethal

12.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cudlee Creek

8

Lobethal

73

Population

Cudlee Creek

425

Lobethal

2,534

Metric leadCudlee Creek 3Lobethal 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCudlee CreekLobethal
Overall score36.1/10057.2/100
Housing (desirability)50.3/10064.1/100
Crime rate43.7 / 1k12.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools—2
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops217
Walkability3.0/10058.5/100
Nearby amenities873
Planning activity949
Green cover6.4%1.1%
Population4252,534
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/105/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Cudlee Creek is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, and Lobethal is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood.

On the data, Cudlee Creek is stronger for tree cover and green space, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Lobethal answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access.

On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Lobethal, while Cudlee Creek remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons