Overall score
Cudlee Creek
41.3/100
Lobethal
62.1/100
Cudlee Creek for retirees; Lobethal for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Cudlee Creek
41.3/100
Lobethal
62.1/100
Crime rate
Cudlee Creek
19.7 / 1k
Lobethal
12.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cudlee Creek
2
Lobethal
69
Population
Cudlee Creek
425
Lobethal
2,534
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Cudlee Creek | Lobethal |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 41.3/100 | 62.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 72.6/100 | 79.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 19.7 / 1k | 12.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 2 | 17 |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 58.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 69 |
| Planning activity | 8 | 44 |
| Population | 425 | 2,534 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 5/10 |
Put side by side, Cudlee Creek is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, and Lobethal is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood.
On the data, Cudlee Creek is stronger for a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Lobethal answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Retirees may find Cudlee Creek the better fit, while families and investors are more likely to prefer Lobethal.