Fyshwick vs Queanbeyan Suburb Comparison (ACT vs NSW)

Queanbeyan for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FyshwickQueanbeyan

Overall score

Fyshwick

—

Queanbeyan

53.4/100

Crime rate

Fyshwick

12894.7 / 1k

Queanbeyan

61.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fyshwick

522

Queanbeyan

301

Population

Fyshwick

52

Queanbeyan

6,409

Metric leadFyshwick 2Queanbeyan 5across 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFyshwickQueanbeyan
Overall score—53.4/100
Housing (desirability)—54.9/100
Crime rate12894.7 / 1k61.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools—9
Weather (desirability)—51.2/100
Parks & reserves18
Public transport stops—66
Walkability60.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities522301
Planning activity1830
Green cover3.8%4.7%
Population526,409
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)—6/10

Comparison summary

Across states, Fyshwick is a residential smaller community with a settled community character, whereas Queanbeyan is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Fyshwick sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Queanbeyan is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Fyshwick is stronger for nearby cafés and amenities, plus a calmer planning outlook; Queanbeyan answers with a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and walkability. Fyshwick generally means more mid-market housing value, while Queanbeyan leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Queanbeyan, while Fyshwick remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons