Overall score
Gilead
24.7/100
Wedderburn
22.2/100
Gilead vs Wedderburn, NSW suburb comparison
Gilead for investment and value; Wedderburn for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
GileadWedderburn
Crime rate
Gilead
123.1 / 1k
Wedderburn
123.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Gilead
2
Wedderburn
5
Population
Gilead
882
Wedderburn
665
Metric leadGilead 4Wedderburn 5across 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesWedderburn
- Best for investmentGilead
- Best for best valueGilead
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Gilead | Wedderburn |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 24.7/100 | 22.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 61.0/100 | 46.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 123.1 / 1k | 123.9 / 1k |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 4 | 6 |
| Walkability | 6.0/100 | 9.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 5 |
| Planning activity | 60 | 7 |
| Population | 882 | 665 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Gilead is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible, while Wedderburn is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel.
Gilead pulls ahead on housing affordability and overall desirability, whereas Wedderburn is the better pick for public transport access and walkability. Gilead generally means more approachable housing costs, while Wedderburn leans toward more sought-after housing.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Gilead the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Wedderburn.