St Helens Park vs Wedderburn, NSW suburb comparison

St Helens Park for families and value; Wedderburn for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

St Helens ParkWedderburn

Overall score

St Helens Park

42.9/100

Wedderburn

22.2/100

Crime rate

St Helens Park

123.4 / 1k

Wedderburn

123.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

St Helens Park

51

Wedderburn

5

Population

St Helens Park

6,647

Wedderburn

665

Metric leadSt Helens Park 8Wedderburn 1across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySt Helens ParkWedderburn
Overall score42.9/10022.2/100
Housing (desirability)61.0/10046.5/100
Crime rate123.4 / 1k123.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools4
Parks & reserves7
Public transport stops766
Walkability30.0/1009.0/100
Nearby amenities515
Planning activity16
Population6,647665
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, St Helens Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Wedderburn is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel. St Helens Park sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Wedderburn is further out with more breathing room.

On the data, St Helens Park is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Wedderburn answers with a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage. St Helens Park generally means more approachable housing costs, while Wedderburn leans toward more sought-after housing.

Choose St Helens Park if you are weighing families and value-focused buyers; lean toward Wedderburn for retirees and investors.

Related comparisons