Gilead vs St Helens Park, NSW suburb comparison

Gilead for investment; St Helens Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GileadSt Helens Park

Overall score

Gilead

24.7/100

St Helens Park

42.9/100

Crime rate

Gilead

123.1 / 1k

St Helens Park

123.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Gilead

2

St Helens Park

51

Population

Gilead

882

St Helens Park

6,647

Metric leadGilead 1St Helens Park 81 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGileadSt Helens Park
Overall score24.7/10042.9/100
Housing (desirability)61.0/10061.0/100
Crime rate123.1 / 1k123.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools4
Parks & reserves17
Public transport stops476
Walkability6.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities251
Planning activity601
Population8826,647
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/103/10

Comparison summary

Gilead is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible, while St Helens Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Gilead sits further out with more breathing room, whereas St Helens Park is in a middle-ring position.

Gilead pulls ahead on relatively affordable housing and a mature, settled community, whereas St Helens Park is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.

Investors may find Gilead the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer St Helens Park.

Related comparisons