Gilead vs St Helens Park, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Gilead | St Helens Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 24.7/100 | 39.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 61.0/100 | 61.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 133.8 / 1k | 133.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 7 |
| Public transport stops | 4 | 76 |
| Walkability | 6.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 51 |
| Planning activity | 44 | 34 |
| Population | 882 | 6,647 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 3/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesSt Helens Park
- Best for familiesSt Helens Park
- Best for investmentGilead
- Best for best valueSt Helens Park
- Best for best schoolsSt Helens Park
Comparison summary
Gilead and St Helens Park offer different strengths across official suburb data. St Helens Park leads on more comparison categories overall. Overall score favours St Helens Park; Crime rate favours St Helens Park; Parks & reserves favours St Helens Park. Quick verdicts: Retirees → St Helens Park, Families → St Helens Park, Investment → Gilead, Best value → St Helens Park.