Englorie Park vs St Helens Park, NSW Suburb Comparison

Englorie Park for investment and schools; St Helens Park for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Englorie ParkSt Helens Park

Overall score

Englorie Park

32.9/100

St Helens Park

37.6/100

Crime rate

Englorie Park

122.4 / 1k

St Helens Park

123.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Englorie Park

6

St Helens Park

52

Population

Englorie Park

361

St Helens Park

6,647

Metric leadEnglorie Park 5St Helens Park 61 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryEnglorie ParkSt Helens Park
Overall score32.9/10037.6/100
Housing (desirability)74.4/10046.5/100
Crime rate122.4 / 1k123.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools64
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—7
Public transport stops476
Walkability6.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities652
Planning activity12
Green cover9.2%55.7%
Population3616,647
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/103/10

Comparison summary

Englorie Park is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, while St Helens Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Englorie Park sits further out with more breathing room, whereas St Helens Park is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Englorie Park is stronger for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook; St Helens Park answers with public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Englorie Park the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer St Helens Park.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons