Englorie Park vs Glen Alpine, NSW Suburb Comparison

Englorie Park for investment; Glen Alpine for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Englorie ParkGlen Alpine

Overall score

Englorie Park

32.9/100

Glen Alpine

52.0/100

Crime rate

Englorie Park

122.4 / 1k

Glen Alpine

14.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Englorie Park

6

Glen Alpine

40

Population

Englorie Park

361

Glen Alpine

4,429

Metric leadEnglorie Park 4Glen Alpine 71 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryEnglorie ParkGlen Alpine
Overall score32.9/10052.0/100
Housing (desirability)74.4/10041.5/100
Crime rate122.4 / 1k14.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools64
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—5
Public transport stops468
Walkability6.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities640
Planning activity14
Green cover9.2%6.8%
Population3614,429
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/1010/10

Comparison summary

Englorie Park reads as a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm; Glen Alpine is a sought-after metro mid-sized suburb where housing reflects strong local demand. Englorie Park sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Glen Alpine is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Englorie Park is stronger for schools and education options, plus a calmer planning outlook; Glen Alpine answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Glen Alpine, while Englorie Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons