Glen Alpine vs Rosemeadow, NSW suburb comparison

Glen Alpine for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Glen AlpineRosemeadow

Overall score

Glen Alpine

52.7/100

Rosemeadow

52.2/100

Crime rate

Glen Alpine

14.1 / 1k

Rosemeadow

123.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Glen Alpine

36

Rosemeadow

60

Population

Glen Alpine

4,429

Rosemeadow

8,007

Metric leadGlen Alpine 5Rosemeadow 6across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGlen AlpineRosemeadow
Overall score52.7/10052.2/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10061.0/100
Crime rate14.1 / 1k123.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools47
Parks & reserves511
Public transport stops6860
Walkability30.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities3660
Planning activity42
Population4,4298,007
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/102/10

Comparison summary

Glen Alpine reads as a settled metro mid-sized suburb that balances access with everyday calm; Rosemeadow is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Glen Alpine sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Rosemeadow is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Glen Alpine is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Rosemeadow answers with parks and reserves and walkability. On housing, Glen Alpine sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Rosemeadow.

Glen Alpine suits retirees and investors more clearly, whereas Rosemeadow is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons