Overall score
Gilston
34.2/100
Lower Beechmont
41.9/100
Gilston for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Gilston
34.2/100
Lower Beechmont
41.9/100
Crime rate
Gilston
35.4 / 1k
Lower Beechmont
35.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Gilston
10
Lower Beechmont
12
Population
Gilston
2,669
Lower Beechmont
1,067
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Gilston | Lower Beechmont |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 34.2/100 | 41.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 66.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 35.4 / 1k | 35.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 7 | — |
| Walkability | 10.5/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 10 | 12 |
| Population | 2,669 | 1,067 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 6/10 |
Gilston reads as a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city; Lower Beechmont is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Lower Beechmont sits among greener hillside streets, while Gilston keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Gilston tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Lower Beechmont stands out for parks and reserves and nearby cafés and amenities. Gilston generally means more sought-after housing, while Lower Beechmont leans toward more mid-market housing value.
On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Gilston, while Lower Beechmont remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.