Gilston vs Lower Beechmont, QLD suburb comparison

Gilston for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GilstonLower Beechmont

Overall score

Gilston

34.2/100

Lower Beechmont

41.9/100

Crime rate

Gilston

35.4 / 1k

Lower Beechmont

35.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Gilston

10

Lower Beechmont

12

Population

Gilston

2,669

Lower Beechmont

1,067

Metric leadGilston 4Lower Beechmont 4across 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGilstonLower Beechmont
Overall score34.2/10041.9/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10066.7/100
Crime rate35.4 / 1k35.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Parks & reserves18
Public transport stops7
Walkability10.5/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities1012
Population2,6691,067
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/106/10

Comparison summary

Gilston reads as a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city; Lower Beechmont is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Lower Beechmont sits among greener hillside streets, while Gilston keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Gilston tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Lower Beechmont stands out for parks and reserves and nearby cafés and amenities. Gilston generally means more sought-after housing, while Lower Beechmont leans toward more mid-market housing value.

On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Gilston, while Lower Beechmont remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons