Gilston vs Lower Beechmont, QLD Suburb Comparison

Lower Beechmont for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GilstonLower Beechmont

Overall score

Gilston

40.3/100

Lower Beechmont

59.2/100

Crime rate

Gilston

57.0 / 1k

Lower Beechmont

57.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Gilston

13

Lower Beechmont

13

Population

Gilston

2,669

Lower Beechmont

1,067

Metric leadGilston 4Lower Beechmont 42 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGilstonLower Beechmont
Overall score40.3/10059.2/100
Housing (desirability)41.1/10059.5/100
Crime rate57.0 / 1k57.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves18
Public transport stops7—
Walkability10.5/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities1313
Green cover2.6%59.6%
Population2,6691,067
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/106/10

Comparison summary

Gilston reads as a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm; Lower Beechmont is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Lower Beechmont sits among greener hillside streets, while Gilston keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Gilston tends to lead on housing affordability, walkability, and a larger local community, while Lower Beechmont stands out for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and overall desirability. Gilston generally means more sought-after housing, while Lower Beechmont leans toward more mid-market housing value.

On balance, retirees, investors, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Gilston, while Lower Beechmont remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons