Gilston vs Nerang, QLD Suburb Comparison

Gilston for families and schools; Nerang for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GilstonNerang

Overall score

Gilston

40.3/100

Nerang

39.4/100

Crime rate

Gilston

57.0 / 1k

Nerang

57.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Gilston

13

Nerang

9

Population

Gilston

2,669

Nerang

17,048

Metric leadGilston 4Nerang 71 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGilstonNerang
Overall score40.3/10039.4/100
Housing (desirability)41.1/10069.0/100
Crime rate57.0 / 1k57.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools13
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves132
Public transport stops758
Walkability10.5/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities139
Green cover2.6%5.6%
Population2,66917,048
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/103/10

Comparison summary

Gilston is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, while Nerang is a metro established suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.

Gilston pulls ahead on nearby cafés and amenities, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Nerang is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.

Choose Gilston if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Nerang for families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons