Overall score
Mount Nathan
50.6/100
Nerang
39.4/100
Mount Nathan vs Nerang, QLD Suburb Comparison
Mount Nathan for families and value; Nerang for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Mount NathanNerang
Crime rate
Mount Nathan
57.0 / 1k
Nerang
57.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Nathan
4
Nerang
9
Population
Mount Nathan
1,375
Nerang
17,048
Metric leadMount Nathan 4Nerang 61 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesMount Nathan
- Best for investmentNerang
- Best for best valueMount Nathan
- Best for best schoolsMount Nathan
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Nathan | Nerang |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.6/100 | 39.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 43.2/100 | 69.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 57.0 / 1k | 57.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 11 | 32 |
| Public transport stops | — | 58 |
| Walkability | 2.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 4 | 9 |
| Green cover | 51.7% | 5.6% |
| Population | 1,375 | 17,048 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Mount Nathan reads as a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks; Nerang is a metro established suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm. Mount Nathan sits among greener hillside streets, while Nerang keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Mount Nathan is stronger for stronger socioeconomic advantage; Nerang answers with a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.
Choose Mount Nathan if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Nerang for value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.