Maudsland vs Mount Nathan, QLD Suburb Comparison

Mount Nathan for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MaudslandMount Nathan

Overall score

Maudsland

42.4/100

Mount Nathan

50.6/100

Crime rate

Maudsland

46.3 / 1k

Mount Nathan

57.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Maudsland

7

Mount Nathan

4

Population

Maudsland

8,073

Mount Nathan

1,375

Metric leadMaudsland 4Mount Nathan 42 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMaudslandMount Nathan
Overall score42.4/10050.6/100
Housing (desirability)39.8/10043.2/100
Crime rate46.3 / 1k57.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves611
Public transport stops3—
Walkability4.5/1002.0/100
Nearby amenities74
Green cover8.5%51.7%
Population8,0731,375
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Maudsland is a sought-after metro established suburb where housing reflects strong local demand, and Mount Nathan is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Mount Nathan sits among greener hillside streets, while Maudsland keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Maudsland tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Mount Nathan stands out for parks and reserves.

On balance, retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Maudsland, while Mount Nathan remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons