Overall score
Maudsland
42.4/100
Wongawallan
42.5/100
Maudsland vs Wongawallan, QLD Suburb Comparison
Maudsland for retirees and families; Wongawallan for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
MaudslandWongawallan
Crime rate
Maudsland
46.3 / 1k
Wongawallan
46.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Maudsland
7
Wongawallan
2
Population
Maudsland
8,073
Wongawallan
1,415
Metric leadMaudsland 5Wongawallan 32 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesMaudsland
- Best for familiesMaudsland
- Best for best schoolsWongawallan
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Maudsland | Wongawallan |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 42.4/100 | 42.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 39.8/100 | 43.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 46.3 / 1k | 46.0 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 3 | — |
| Walkability | 4.5/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 7 | 2 |
| Green cover | 8.5% | 0.5% |
| Population | 8,073 | 1,415 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Maudsland is a sought-after metro established suburb where housing reflects strong local demand, and Wongawallan is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand.
Maudsland pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and walkability, whereas Wongawallan is the better pick for an affluent, sought-after address and an emerging neighbourhood.
On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Maudsland, while Wongawallan remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.