Overall score
Maudsland
46.3/100
Pacific Pines
68.8/100
Maudsland vs Pacific Pines, QLD suburb comparison
Maudsland for retirees and families; Pacific Pines for value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
MaudslandPacific Pines
Crime rate
Maudsland
29.1 / 1k
Pacific Pines
35.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Maudsland
6
Pacific Pines
206
Population
Maudsland
8,073
Pacific Pines
16,664
Metric leadMaudsland 2Pacific Pines 61 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesMaudsland
- Best for familiesMaudsland
- Best for best valuePacific Pines
- Best for best schoolsMaudsland
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Maudsland | Pacific Pines |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 46.3/100 | 68.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 29.1 / 1k | 35.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 20 |
| Public transport stops | 3 | 54 |
| Walkability | 4.5/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 6 | 206 |
| Population | 8,073 | 16,664 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Maudsland reads as a practical metro established suburb with solid links to the wider city; Pacific Pines is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Maudsland sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Pacific Pines is in a middle-ring position.
Maudsland tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Pacific Pines stands out for parks and reserves and public transport access.
Retirees and families may find Maudsland the better fit, while value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Pacific Pines.