Maudsland vs Pacific Pines, QLD Suburb Comparison

Maudsland for schools; Pacific Pines for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MaudslandPacific Pines

Overall score

Maudsland

42.4/100

Pacific Pines

56.2/100

Crime rate

Maudsland

46.3 / 1k

Pacific Pines

57.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Maudsland

7

Pacific Pines

208

Population

Maudsland

8,073

Pacific Pines

16,664

Metric leadMaudsland 2Pacific Pines 81 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMaudslandPacific Pines
Overall score42.4/10056.2/100
Housing (desirability)39.8/10044.1/100
Crime rate46.3 / 1k57.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools—4
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves620
Public transport stops354
Walkability4.5/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities7208
Green cover8.5%16.9%
Population8,07316,664
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/107/10

Comparison summary

Maudsland reads as a sought-after metro established suburb where housing reflects strong local demand; Pacific Pines is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Maudsland sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Pacific Pines is in a middle-ring position.

Maudsland tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Pacific Pines stands out for parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability.

Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Maudsland the better fit, while value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Pacific Pines.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons